MathCo vs LeewayHertz: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
MathCo (4.1/5) edges ahead of LeewayHertz (3.6/5) overall. MathCo is the better choice for enterprises wanting agentic AI from a dual-headquartered US/India analytics firm with genuine leadership in both locations.. LeewayHertz is the stronger option for enterprises wanting multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
MathCo vs LeewayHertz: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | MathCo | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2007 |
| HQ | Chicago, IL, USA | Gurugram, India |
| Team size | 1,001–5,000 | 51–300 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | Enterprises wanting agentic AI from a dual-headquartered US/India analytics firm with genuine leadership in both locations. | Enterprises wanting multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach. |
| Pricing model | Retainer, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, AWS | Python, LangChain, LangGraph |
| Industries served | Financial Services, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS |
MathCo vs LeewayHertz: overview
MathCo
MathCo (formally TheMathCompany) was founded in 2016 and operates dual headquarters in Chicago, Illinois and Bangalore, India, with approximately 2,000 employees across five continents. A global enterprise AI and analytics company, it applies its data science and AI platform work to agentic AI, giving buyers a mid-large firm with genuine dual-continent leadership rather than a single offshore delivery center dressed up as a US company.
LeewayHertz
LeewayHertz is an AI development company founded in 2007, with LinkedIn listing its headquarters in Gurugram, Haryana, India and other sources noting a San Francisco corporate office; reported headcount ranges from roughly 180 to 300 employees. The firm was acquired by The Hackett Group on September 16, 2024, which now folds LeewayHertz's AI and agent development capability into Hackett's broader enterprise consulting business — a material ownership change buyers should factor into long-term vendor continuity planning.
Services and capabilities: MathCo vs LeewayHertz
| Capability | MathCo | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✗ | ✓ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: MathCo vs LeewayHertz
| Framework / platform | MathCo | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | ✓ |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: MathCo vs LeewayHertz
| Criterion | MathCo | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Retainer, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: MathCo vs LeewayHertz
| Dimension | MathCo | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial Services, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Enterprises wanting agentic AI bundled with a broader enterprise AI/analytics platform engagement, Buyers wanting genuine dual-continent account leadership, not just offshore delivery | Multi-agent architecture design for data-rich enterprise environments, Agents requiring deep ERP or CRM integration (e.g. Salesforce, SAP) |
| Typical project type | Retainer | Fixed project |
MathCo vs LeewayHertz: pros and cons
| MathCo | |
|---|---|
| + | Genuine dual headquarters (Chicago, Bangalore) rather than a US sales front over offshore delivery |
| + | A decade of enterprise AI and analytics history since 2016 |
| + | ~2,000 employees across five continents gives substantial bench depth |
| + | Existing enterprise data and AI platform work gives agentic use cases a mature foundation |
| - | Agentic AI is an application of a broader enterprise AI and analytics platform, not a standalone specialty |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | Reported employee counts vary by source, worth confirming current headcount directly |
| LeewayHertz | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearly two decades of AI development history since 2007 |
| + | Deep experience with multi-agent orchestration framework selection for complex environments |
| + | Strong ERP/CRM integration experience for enterprise data-rich deployments |
| + | Post-acquisition access to The Hackett Group's broader enterprise consulting network |
| - | Acquired by The Hackett Group in September 2024 — a material ownership change that can affect team continuity |
| - | Reported headquarters and headcount vary noticeably across sources |
| - | Heavy content-marketing presence means its public profile can outpace independently verified differentiation versus peers of similar size |
Who should choose MathCo?
MathCo is the right choice for enterprises wanting agentic AI from a dual-headquartered US/India analytics firm with genuine leadership in both locations..
Genuine dual headquarters (Chicago and Bangalore, not just a sales office over an offshore delivery center) at ~2,000-person scale.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS.
Who should choose LeewayHertz?
LeewayHertz is the right choice for enterprises wanting multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach..
Deep multi-agent architecture and orchestration-framework selection experience, now combined with The Hackett Group's enterprise consulting network post-acquisition.. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS.
Decision matrix: MathCo vs LeewayHertz
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | LeewayHertz |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | MathCo |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: MathCo (Not published) vs LeewayHertz ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | MathCo |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: MathCo vs LeewayHertz
| Use case | MathCo fit | LeewayHertz fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprises wanting agentic AI bundled with a broader enterprise AI/analytics platform engagement | Strong | Limited | MathCo |
| Buyers wanting genuine dual-continent account leadership, not just offshore delivery | Strong | Limited | MathCo |
| Multi-agent architecture design for data-rich enterprise environments | Limited | Strong | LeewayHertz |
| Agents requiring deep ERP or CRM integration (e.g. Salesforce, SAP) | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: MathCo vs LeewayHertz
MathCo (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Agentic AI projects. Genuine dual headquarters (Chicago and Bangalore, not just a sales office over an offshore delivery center) at ~2,000-person scale.. It is best for enterprises wanting agentic AI from a dual-headquartered US/India analytics firm with genuine leadership in both locations..
LeewayHertz (3.6/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach.. If your situation matches those criteria, LeewayHertz is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
MathCo vs LeewayHertz FAQ
Is MathCo better than LeewayHertz?
MathCo (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. MathCo is better for enterprises wanting agentic AI from a dual-headquartered US/India analytics firm with genuine leadership in both locations.. LeewayHertz is better for enterprises wanting multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach..
How do MathCo and LeewayHertz differ in pricing?
MathCo uses retainer, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. LeewayHertz uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: MathCo or LeewayHertz?
MathCo is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between MathCo and LeewayHertz?
MathCo's primary differentiator is: genuine dual headquarters (chicago and bangalore, not just a sales office over an offshore delivery center) at ~2,000-person scale.. LeewayHertz's primary differentiator is: deep multi-agent architecture and orchestration-framework selection experience, now combined with the hackett group's enterprise consulting network post-acquisition.. They also differ in team size (1,001–5,000 vs 51–300), minimum engagement (Not published vs $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Retail & E-commerce vs Financial Services, Manufacturing).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.